|
Posted
May 3, 2000
PART
1
Definitely
Not Your Father's Newspaper
Special
to Poynter.org
Preliminary
analysis of research conducted by Stanford University and The Poynter
Institute indicates that text plays a more important role than graphics
as entry points for online news.
Compared with
similar research into newspaper reading patterns conducted by Poynter
10 years ago, these latest
findings suggest some of the differences between reading from
a screen and reading from a printed page.
The earlier
study found that readers of print newspapers look first at the
lead art element on the page, then move their eyes to the biggest
headline on the page.
The Stanford-Poynter
study of online readership found readers often fixating first on
news briefs or captions. Researchers noticed that readers' eyes
then shifted to the photos and graphics on the screen, usually after
they had returned to the first page after clicking on a brief to
get to the complete article.
The Stanford-Poynter
study involved 67 subjects recruited through notices published in
the online editions of the Chicago Sun-Times and the St.
Petersburg Times. The subjects were experienced and regular
users of the web who said they read news online at least three times
a week.
To test the
text-first pattern they observed in the subjects' reading, the researchers
analyzed in detail the front page for every fifth subject for a
total of 14 out of the 67 subjects. Seven of the subjects fixated
first on text in their reading; four looked first at graphics; three
had neither graphics nor photos on the online pages they read.
The study
was intended to gather information about readership of online news.
Unlike a statistically valid exit poll of voters, for example, this
study cannot be used to measure, precisely, the behavior of all
readers of online news. But it does enable researchers to draw such
general conclusions as the relative importance of text over graphics
as entry points among heavy users of online news.
"We are going
to further analyze our data to test this preliminary finding," said
the study's principal investigator, Marion Lewenstein, professor
of communication emerita at Stanford. "Currently, we have analyzed
only the front pages called up by every fifth subject. We want to
check more pages per subject, and perhaps more subjects, to see
if this pattern continues to hold up."
The latest
study also found:
- Forty-five
percent of the banner ads presented on the subjects' screens were
viewed. That's a lower fixation rate than photos (64 percent of
the photos were viewed), but higher than the rate for tile ads
and promotional icons (22 percent).
- Most subjects
used the back button and the scroll bar to navigate through stories.
Precise percentages are not yet available in this area. Further
research could prove important to designers' decisions about whether
online content is best presented on long scrollable pages or on
shorter pages that require the user to click to a new page.
- Forty-five
percent of the subjects went first to a local newspaper's online
edition as they began their online news reading session; 28 percent
went to a national site; 8 percent to a specialty site; and 9
percent to a portal.
The subjects'
eye movements were tracked by a lightweight, head-mounted device
originally developed by the military and later adapted by market
researchers.
The study
was funded by The Poynter Institute. In addition to Lewenstein,
the study was conducted by research associate Greg Edwards, a staff
researcher at Stanford and expert in eyetracking; research associate
Deborah Tatar, who holds a Ph.D. in psychology from Stanford; and
Andrew DeVigal, a Poynter Fellow and expert in online design.
As the 67
volunteers spent a total of 40 hours surfing their favorite news
portal sites, the Stanford-Poynter team computer-recorded their
eye movements, screen images, and keyboard activity. A total of
608,063 eye fixations and 24,530 mouse clicks were monitored.
Specially
written software captured both eyetracking movements and the content
of the website the user was looking at on the computer monitor.
Whenever the eye stopped, it was counted as a fixation, and each
fixation was overlaid against the website's content.
Part 2 -- More on the Stanford-Poynter
Eyetrack study and its implications.

Eyetrack
Updates:
Join the mailing list and get update alerts via e-mail. Fill out
the form.
|